I promised Brandon I’d update this when I got into grad school, so here it goes. This would have been sooner, but with graduating (Magna cum Laude with Honors and Thesis) and moving here to Northern California, I’ve been simply swamped. I got into SFSU Classics program, and so far, it’s not bad at all. […]
John Kloppenborg hypothesizes that Q was composed in three stages (see his Formation of Q or Excavating Q). Brackets indicate that I am unsure this is the first time he proposed such a change. Parentheses indicate Kloppenborg’s tentative conclusions. Letters represent blocks of Q material, when in quotes, a new block is added, […]
This is a comparison of the Burton L. Mack’s and John Dominic Crossan’s work on Q’s compositional history and the historical Jesus. See previous post for clarification.
Of Crossan’s 503 original complexes attributed to Jesus in early Christian writings, Mack declared that less than 10% of them are candidates for authenticity (Lost Gospel, 191). Mack […]
Scholars often make minor changes in opinion and are not explicit about it, which can be frustrating to those trying to understand their own position in relation to them. Moreover, scholars often appropriate other work and make minor changes that they are similarly quiet about. Below I have Burton L. Mack, J. Dominic […]
Thoughts on Antiquity is is proudly powered by Wordpress
GPS Fluid Theme by GPS Gazette